Cylindrical Semi-martingale Optimal Transport and Contiguity: Applications to Large Financial Markets

The motivation for moving beyond classical Optimal Transport (OT)

The theory of Optimal Transport (OT) lies at the crossroads of mathematics, statistics, finance, and machine learning. In the classical setting, OT seeks an optimal coupling between two probability measures on a finite-dimensional space. However, taking as motivation the theory of (LFM) Large Financial Markets[2], where one encounters infinitely many assets, the relevant objects are infinite-dimensional stochastic processes. Since probability measures on infinite-dimensional spaces are typically only cylindrical, defined through their finite-dimensional marginals rather than on the full space, classical OT must be replaced by its cylindrical, semi-martingale counterpart. The following sections develop this framework and its interplay with the probabilistic notion of contiguity, central in the theory of LFM.

From Finite Dimensions to Cylindrical Semi-martingales

Optimal Transport of Cylindrical Semi-martingale Laws

Consider cylindrical laws \(\mathbb{P} = (\mathbb{P}^n)_{n \geq 1}\) and \(\mathbb{Q} = (\mathbb{Q}^n)_{n \geq 1}\), where each \(\mathbb{P}^n\), \(\mathbb{Q}^n\) is a measure on \(\mathbb{D}([0,T]; \mathbb{R}^n)\) (vector-valued Skorokhod space)[4]. The cylindrical OT problem seeks an optimal coupling at every level \(n\) that is consistent as \(n \to \infty\). For cost functionals \(C_n\):

\[ \inf_{\pi^n \in \Pi(\mathbb{P}^n, \mathbb{Q}^n)} \int C_n(\omega, \eta) \;\pi^n(d\omega, d\eta) \] subject to martingale/semi-martingale constraints on projections.

Contiguity of Probability Measures

Given sequences of probability measures \((\mathbb{P}_n)\), \((\mathbb{Q}_n)\) on a common measurable space, \[ \mathbb{Q}_n \triangleleft \mathbb{P}_n\quad \Longleftrightarrow\quad \forall A_n: \ \mathbb{P}_n(A_n) \to 0 \implies \mathbb{Q}_n(A_n) \to 0. \] That is, any sequence of events negligible under \(\mathbb{P}_n\) is also negligible under \(\mathbb{Q}_n\). This "vanishing together" ensures no sequence of events has probability "leaking" from 1 to 0[5].

In large financial markets (cf. Kabanov & Kramkov[2]), contiguity replaces absolute continuity as we move from static to growing, infinite systems. It ensures stability of risk-neutral pricing, the absence of asymptotic arbitrage, and robust duality for hedging/pricing limits.

Applications in Large Financial Markets

  1. Model-Independent Pricing & Hedging:
    Superhedging prices may be characterized as the values of martingale OT problems indexed by \(n\), with existence and duality persisting when contiguity holds: \[ \mathrm{price}_n = \sup_{\mathbb{Q}_n \triangleleft \mathbb{P}_n, \ \mathbb{Q}_n \text{ martingale}} \mathbb{E}_{\mathbb{Q}_n}[H_n] \] and as \(n \to \infty\), price stability follows from the consistency/contiguity apparatus.
  2. No-Free-Lunch Equivalents:
    The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing for large markets is equivalent to the existence of a contiguous family of equivalent martingale measures (\(\mathbb{Q}_n \triangleleft \mathbb{P}_n\)), which excludes asymptotic arbitrage.
  3. Risk Management:
    In large/infinite universes (indices, climate, operational risk, etc), we encounter portfolios on spaces where only finite margins are observable. Robust risk bounds rely on cylindrical formulations and the preservation of tail properties via contiguity.

OVanishing Risk and Cylindrical Semimartingale Optimal Transport

Let \((S^{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\) be a sequence of \(n\) dimensional semimartingale financial markets, interpreted as finite-asset projections of an infinite (large) market, and assume trading is frictionless and self-financing.

Suppose that the sequence satisfies No Free Lunch with Vanishing Risk (NFLVR)[6] in the sense of large financial markets (i.e., no asymptotic arbitrage).

Questions.
  • Can we define a notion of cylindrical semimartingale optimal transport on path space for large or infinite-dimensional financial markets?
  • Is NFLVR (No Free Lunch with Vanishing Risk) equivalent to a compactness or stability property of the corresponding transport problems as the dimension \(n\) grows?
  • Does the dual formulation of such transport problems necessarily yield a projectively consistent family of (sigma-)martingale measures[7]?
  • Does the failure of NFLVR manifest as the existence of transport directions with vanishing cost but strictly positive expected payoff?
In particular: Can the classical closure conditions underlying NFLVR be reformulated as lower semicontinuity or tightness properties in a suitable optimal transport topology on cylindrical semimartingale laws?

References

  1. Dolinsky, Y., & Soner, H. M. (2015). Martingale optimal transport in the Skorokhod space. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 125(10), 3893-3931.
  2. Kabanov, Y., & Kramkov, D. (1994). Large Financial Markets: Asymptotic Arbitrage and Contiguity. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 39(1), 182-187. [PDF]
  3. Tsirelson, B. S. (2004). Nonclassical stochastic flows and continuous products. Probability Surveys, 1, 173-298.
  4. Jacod, J., & Shiryaev, A. N. (2003). Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes (2nd ed.). Springer.
  5. Contiguity (probability theory). Wikipedia.
  6. No free lunch with vanishing risk. Wikipedia.
  7. Sigma-martingale. Wikipedia.

Conclusion

In summary: Cylindrical semi-martingale optimal transport and contiguity are fundamental for modern mathematical finance, economics, and probability. They provide the toolbox needed for robust pricing and hedging in infinite-dimensional models, managing risk in sprawling markets, and ensuring that the mathematical structure persists as complexity grows. Their interplay signals new frontiers for theory and practice alike.